Share
Array
(
[0] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 15557
[post_author] => 5
[post_date] => 2025-09-29 08:22:02
[post_date_gmt] => 2025-09-29 08:22:02
[post_content] => UNGA80 delivered no shortage of headlines – Palestinian statehood, climate action and the usual high drama of High-Level Week. While others parse the geopolitics, we’re zeroing in on some U.S.-UN issues that hit close to home.
Here are five big takeaways:
1. Haiti: A Referendum on U.S. Reliability
In one of UNGA’s most searing addresses, Haiti’s transitional president Laurent Saint-Cyr described a country suffocating under gang control, wracked by murders, rapes, famine and mass displacement. For the U.S., this is not abstract. Instability drives migration to Florida and opens space for rivals in our own backyard.
That’s why Washington is pushing to expand the Kenyan-led Multinational Security Support Mission (MSS) into a larger Gang Suppression Force. The proposal has broad support from the international community, but previous U.S. financial pledges to the MSS remain unmet. Plus, the U.S. just pulled back over $600 million in previously pledged funds to UN peacekeeping. In short, if Washington refuses to pay its fair share, there will be no mission.
Takeaway
Instability in Haiti drives migration and fuels rival influence – yet U.S. funding shortfalls threaten Haitian security and American credibility.
2. Syria: Back on the World Stage
For the first time in six decades, a Syrian leader addressed the Assembly. Interim president Ahmad al-Sharaa pledged justice, rebuilding and elections. Crowds in Damascus cheered; protests in New York showed deep divisions.
For Washington, the puzzle is sanctions. Al-Sharaa pressed for sweeping relief, but only Congress can unwind the Caesar Act that keeps those sanctions in place. The U.S. must weigh humanitarian needs against leverage for accountability and minority protections.
Security concerns add another layer. Trafficking, cross-border strikes with Israel and the lingering threat of extremist groups all require sustained oversight. Here, the UN is uniquely positioned to play a central role – monitoring ceasefire arrangements, verifying counter-narcotics claims and benchmarking human rights protections before recognition or aid flows too far. U.S. enforcement agencies don’t want to be on the front lines; the UN has and can continue to be a proxy for such oversight.
Takeaway
Syria may be back at the dais, but legitimacy is earned. For the U.S., UN engagement tied to progress protects civilians and avoids boots on the ground.
3. Trump’s Pivot on Ukraine
President Trump used his UNGA speech to flip his stance on Ukraine. After months urging compromise, he now embraces full victory, declaring Ukraine can “fight and WIN” back its borders. Pressed on NATO’s role if Russian aircraft enter allied airspace, Trump was unequivocal: “Yes, I do.” After meeting with President Zelensky, he wrote on Truth Social: “With time, patience and the financial support of Europe and NATO, the original Borders… are very much an option. Why not?” Called Russia a “paper tiger,” he derided Putin for “fighting aimlessly” for years.
The pivot raises expectations for sustained U.S. and NATO support, not just defensive aid but possibly offensive systems. That could reignite Congressional divides over funding levels, even as rescissions and arrears pile up. At the same time, Trump’s endorsement of NATO defense commitments pulls the U.S. deeper into Article 5 obligations at a moment of heightened Russian drone incursions in Poland and the Baltics.
Takeaway
Trump’s call for outright Ukrainian victory raises expectations for expanded aid and multilateral commitments, putting new pressure on appropriations and U.S. credibility.
4. Bureaucracy on a Budget
If one theme cut through UNGA80, it was reform. Secretary-General António Guterres pushed his UN80 plan to cut costs, streamline operations and refocus the institution. Proposals include an historic 15 percent core budget cut in 2026, eliminating nearly one in five posts and consolidating in lower-cost hubs.
For Washington, this is an opportunity. The U.S. has long pressed for efficiency and accountability. But with $1.5 billion in arrears and recent reneging on promised money, credibility hinges on paying dues. Opponents argue Washington wants reform without responsibility. Congress now decides whether the U.S. shapes reform or sidelines itself. With China and others ready to fill gaps, disengagement costs influence, not just dollars.
Takeaway
UN80 aligns with U.S. demands for efficiency, but without paying our fair share, Washington will lose influence over reforms it has long sought.
5. Escalator-gate: A Master Class in Disinformation
At UNGA80, a brief escalator malfunction involving Trump and the First Lady became a case study in conspiracy. “All I got from the United Nations was an escalator that on the way up stopped right in the middle,” Trump told the Assembly. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt suggested sabotage, fueling #EscalatorGate.
UN officials explained that a U.S. videographer triggered a built-in safety mechanism. In addition, U.S. complaints about sabotage of the teleprompter were also unfounded. The teleprompter, in fact, is operated by the White House and did ultimately work. Still, conspiracy theories spread quickly, amplified by partisan media.
Takeaway
Jokes aside, disinformation spreads faster than facts. Even trivial mishaps can harden distrust of the UN and complicate debates on U.S. funding and leadership.
Bottom Line
UNGA80 underscored how global crises are inseparably linked to the U.S., and why credibility, funding and leadership at the UN matters. As the U.S. weighs its commitments, the world is watching not only what America says in New York, but how it delivers in Washington.
[post_title] => From Escalating Global Conflicts to Escalator-Gate: 5 Takeaways from UNGA80
[post_excerpt] => This year's UN General Assembly put U.S. credibility under the spotlight, from Haiti’s security crisis and Syria’s return to Trump’s Ukraine pivot and sweeping UN reforms. Read our highlights from the debates that showed what America funds — and doesn't — shapes global security and U.S. influence.
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => closed
[ping_status] => closed
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => 5-takeaways-from-unga80
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2025-09-30 08:22:17
[post_modified_gmt] => 2025-09-30 08:22:17
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://betterworldcampaign.org/?p=15557
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => post
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[1] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 15407
[post_author] => 5
[post_date] => 2025-09-24 16:09:27
[post_date_gmt] => 2025-09-24 16:09:27
[post_content] => The 80th UN General Assembly opens under the shadow of U.S. rescissions, $1.5 billion in accumulated arrears, budget battles and renewed debates over America’s role in the very system it helped to build – and still anchors with roughly 22% of its funding.
For diplomats in New World and advocates nationwide, here’s what you need to know about recent actions on Capitol Hill that have ripple effects in Turtle Bay and around the world.
First Rescissions Package
In July, Congress rescinded $9 billion in previously-appropriated funding – nearly $8 billion of which targeted vital international assistance and U.S. contributions to the UN. The measure included $1 billion in FY24 and FY25 funding for the UN.
The bill cut:
- UNICEF: funding for lifesaving programs that vaccinate nearly half the world’s children
- UN peacekeeping operations: including MONUSCO in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and UNIFIL in Lebanon*
- World Health Organization: entirely defunding assessed contributions to the organization and undermining global health coordination and pandemic preparedness
- UN regular budget contributions
*Despite identifying specific missions in the proposal, there remains flexibility in which accounts will be clawed back.
FY26 House Appropriations Bill
On July 23, the House Appropriations Committee marked up its FY26 bill – with significant cuts to the UN.
The bill would:
- Slash Contributions to International Organizations (CIO) by 80%, risking loss of America’s vote in the General Assembly if arrears continue to build
- Cut UN peacekeeping by 55%, undercutting missions the U.S. itself has brokered and endorsed
- Eliminate IO&P entirely, a key source of voluntary funding for the core budgets of UNICEF, UNDP, OHCHR and other critical agencies
- Protect $9.5 billion for global health, including the Global Fund, Gavi and polio eradication
$4.9 Billion Pocket Rescissions Package
In late August, the Administration proposed a second sweeping $4.9 billion rescissions package, including $1 billion in cuts to UN accounts. The claw-back targets funds set to expire at the end of FY25, on September 30. The timing of the package was meant to circumvent Congressional review. While this is legally and constitutionally dubious, Congress is unlikely to take action to vote down the rescission or extend the availability of funds beyond the end of the fiscal year.
Funding clawed back by the Administration includes:
- $521 million from the CIO account: U.S. membership dues that keep our vote in the UN General Assembly and support over 40 other international organizations
- $393 million from the Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities (CIPA) account: FY25 funding for U.S. assessments for UN peacekeeping operations
- $445 million from the Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) account: U.S. share of assessed budget for UN Support Office in Somalia (UNSOS) and support for the Global Peace Operations Initiative (GPOI)
The Bigger Picture
Rescissions and proposed FY26 cuts come at a time when strong U.S. leadership is needed most. By sustaining our commitments, Washington can reaffirm America’s credibility just as allies look to the U.S. to counter aggression and pursue a healthier, safer world.
[post_title] => U.S. Funding for the UN: Where Washington Stands and What’s at Stake
[post_excerpt] => U.S. rescissions and FY26 cuts threaten UN commitments in peacekeeping, health and child survival — putting American leadership and security at risk.
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => closed
[ping_status] => closed
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => un-funding-in-focus-where-washington-stands-and-whats-at-stake
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2025-09-25 19:21:47
[post_modified_gmt] => 2025-09-25 19:21:47
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://betterworldcampaign.org/?p=15407
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => post
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[2] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 15370
[post_author] => 5
[post_date] => 2025-09-23 19:27:36
[post_date_gmt] => 2025-09-23 19:27:36
[post_content] => President Trump’s address to the 80th session of the UN General Assembly was filled with sharp critiques of the institution – charging that it wastes money, fuels migration and fails to deliver results. But listen closely and a more complex story emerges. Between the lines, his words underscore why the United States and the UN are stronger together – containing conflict, managing migration, fighting trafficking and stopping the flow of drugs.
Here are a few key takeaways from his remarks, with context from our very own experts.
Migration
“The UN is supporting people that are illegally coming into the United States… The UN is supposed to stop invasions, not create them.”
President Donald J. Trump, 80th UN General Assembly
Sovereignty is a core principle of the UN, and U.S. law prohibits any UN agency, including the International Organization for Migration (IOM), from encouraging illegal migration. IOM complies fully.
IOM helps curb unsafe and unlawful migration in concrete, lifesaving ways. Its public campaigns warn families about the deadly risks of routes like the Darién Gap, discouraging dangerous journeys before they begin. It has helped more than 4 million Venezuelans secure legal status across South America and the Caribbean, easing the strain on the U.S. border. At the same time, it works with governments to strengthen border management and expand legal migration pathways, offering alternatives to chaos. And by collecting and sharing migration data across the hemisphere, IOM equips policymakers with the foresight and tools they need to respond effectively.
Closer to Home
By helping migrants settle legally in Latin America, IOM reduces the numbers arriving at the U.S. border, easing pressure on communities in Arizona, Texas and California. In Haiti, IOM provides emergency aid that prevents desperate families from attempting the dangerous sea crossings that routinely wash up on Florida shores.
Bottom Line
IOM reduces irregular migration, saves lives and strengthens borders – making America safer.
Human Trafficking
“Any system that results in the mass trafficking of children is inherently evil.”
Pres. Trump
He’s right – trafficking is evil. That’s why, under President Trump’s first term, U.S. contributions to the UN Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture (UNVFVT) actually rose 22%. That support helped nearly 200 NGOs worldwide – many of them U.S.-based – deliver trauma counseling, medical care and legal aid to survivors. Because trafficking is a global crime, it takes global coordination to disrupt networks. The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) helps countries break up trafficking syndicates and reunite families.
Closer to Home
U.S. cities from Minneapolis to Houston rely on UNODC and UNVFVT-supported resources to serve survivors who have fled trafficking or torture. Without this money – and with U.S. contributions now frozen – American NGOs will be forced to turn people away, leaving trauma untreated and communities less safe.
Bottom Line
The UN – through UNODC and the Torture Victims Fund – delivers solutions. Without U.S. payments, those solutions collapse.
Climate & Environment
“Europe reduced its own carbon footprint by 37%… however, it’s been totally wiped out by a global increase of 54%, much of it coming from China.”
Pres. Trump
The President’s frustration here is valid – national sacrifices mean little if other major emitters don’t step up. But that is precisely why the UN’s climate system exists: to set common rules, monitor compliance and hold nations like China accountable.
Closer to Home
UN standards protect American coastlines and jobs. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) enforces agreements like MARPOL and SOLAS rules – which applies to U.S. ports – that limit pollution from ships, keep our waters clean and ensure cruise and cargo vessels operate safely and don’t dump waste in our harbors. Those rules are the reason beaches in Florida, South Carolina and Hawaii remain tourism-worthy destinations – sustaining local economies that rake in billions. UN early warning systems run by UNESCO – which the U.S. just announced it would withdraw from – also help U.S. communities prepare for tsunamis (like last month's big scare), hurricanes, wildfires and droughts, saving lives and property.
Bottom Line
Climate and environmental safeguards are borderless problems. Without multilateral action, national efforts are undercut. And without U.S. leadership in UN frameworks like the IMO, Paris Agreement and UNESCO, our coastlines, tourism economy and jobs are left unprotected.
Drugs & Organized Crime
“Such organizations [cartels and gangs] torture, maim, mutilate and murder with impunity. They’re the enemies of all humanity.”
Pres. Trump
Again, we agree: drug cartels are a scourge on humanity – and again, the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) is the world’s front line in the fight. Working shoulder to shoulder with the U.S., it provides information to countries so they can intercept traffickers at sea, disrupting the same “water drug routes” Trump described. It produces the World Drug Report, the gold standard for tracking global flows and exposes cartels’ reach. And it helps farmers transition from illicit crops to legal livelihoods, cutting off the cartels’ supply at its root.
Closer to Home
UNODC partnerships directly protect Americans. In the Caribbean, joint operations with the U.S. Coast Guard stop cocaine shipments before they reach Miami or New Orleans, while UN-backed opioid programs help states like Ohio and West Virginia respond to the fentanyl epidemic devastating communities.
Bottom Line
The UN is where nations coordinate the fight against drugs – and U.S. leadership helps makes it work. But only if we provide our fair share.
Conflict & Peacekeeping
“We've got to come together. We have to negotiate peace.”
Pres. Trump
Even while taking the UN to task, the President acknowledged the truth at the heart of its mission: peace requires nations to "come together." That is what UN peacekeeping does every day. Research shows UN peacekeeping reduces violence, prevents wars from recurring and protects civilians at one-eighth the cost of traditional U.S. troop deployment.
Closer to Home
UN peacekeeping saves U.S. money and lives, which is why recent Administration directed cuts of over $600 million are counterproductive. By stabilizing places like Congo, Kosovo or Kashmir, it lowers the chance U.S. troops face costly wars.
Bottom Line
Ending wars requires sustained monitoring and stabilization. That’s exactly what the UN is built to do at a fraction of the cost of U.S. boots on the ground.
“100 Percent”
The President came to the UN with pointed critiques. Yet listen closely and his own words remind us that peace requires nations to “come together”; migration must be managed, not ignored; human trafficking is “inherently evil”; drug cartels are “enemies of humanity.”
Those are not arguments against the UN; they are arguments for it.
As he told the Secretary-General upon leaving the General Assembly: “Our country is behind the United Nations 100 percent.”
Now let's match that sentiment with resources.
“Our country is behind the United Nations 100 percent.”
President Donald J. Trump, 80th UN General Assembly
[post_title] => Unpacking President Trump’s Address to the UN General Assembly
[post_excerpt] => While President Trump’s General Assembly speech delivered a harsh critique of the UN, we look between the lines to see how the institution may be the partner America needs.
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => closed
[ping_status] => closed
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => unpacking-president-trumps-address-to-unga80
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2025-09-26 20:07:34
[post_modified_gmt] => 2025-09-26 20:07:34
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://betterworldcampaign.org/?p=15370
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => post
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[3] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 15296
[post_author] => 5
[post_date] => 2025-09-18 17:26:54
[post_date_gmt] => 2025-09-18 17:26:54
[post_content] => For years, Washington has called on the United Nations to cut waste, streamline operations and get serious about reform. Now the UN is doing exactly that. The question is how the U.S. will reward that success just as the job gets traction.
Reform by the Numbers
Earlier this year, UN Secretary-General António Guterres launched UN80, a sweeping initiative to make the UN leaner and more effective. This September, he went further, proposing the biggest cut in decades: a 15% reduction ($500 million) to the UN’s core budget for 2026. That means eliminating nearly one in five posts — about 2,680 jobs. It’s not rhetoric about reform; it’s reform in action.
The restructuring is aimed squarely at long-standing U.S. concerns. At least 200 positions will be moved out of high-cost duty stations like New York and Geneva to cheaper locations such as Nairobi. Payroll and other back-office functions are being consolidated into global hubs and streamlined through automation. And by 2027, the UN will vacate two leased New York buildings, cutting millions in overhead costs.
The numbers tell the story: according to Devex, job postings across the UN system have fallen 43% this year. WHO is down 81%. UNHCR is down 83%. Consulting roles — often the first foothold for Americans in the system — have been cut by 67%.
While staffing cuts are painful, in some cases they are overdue. Paired with new ideas emerging to streamline the UN's mission and structure, these reductions could help build a leaner organization – one that is both more efficient and more effective.
Key Takeaways
-
15% reduction in the UN’s core budget (about $500M) starting in 2026
-
Nearly one in five posts eliminated — roughly 2,680 jobs
-
200+ positions relocated from New York and Geneva to lower-cost hubs like Nairobi
-
Payroll and admin streamlined and automation replacing duplicative staff functions
-
Two UN buildings in New York vacated by 2027, slashing long-term overhead
The Cost of Cuts
Still, cuts of this magnitude carry trade-offs. Every eliminated position represents lost capacity in the field — fewer aid workers in Sudan, fewer coordinators helping Ukraine recover from missile strikes, fewer experts shoring up fragile states in the Sahel or the Pacific.
For the United States, those trade-offs also carry strategic weight, including fewer Americans working at the UN. As field offices, peacekeeping missions and humanitarian hubs slim down, the pipeline for the next generation of Americans narrows. That’s not just a human resources challenge — it’s a geopolitical one. China has increased its nationals in UN posts by 68% over the past decade, treating personnel as strategic investments in global governance.
Nevertheless, this is exactly what the U.S. has been asking for: greater efficiency. And despite the external pressure, what makes UN80 different from past reform pushes is that it’s driven from the inside. Guterres has taken on inefficiencies with transparency and resolve — the kind of leadership the U.S. has said it wants in Turtle Bay. If Washington continues slashing funding as reforms are taking hold (Congress has already clawed back $2 billion in promised resources in recent weeks), it will undermine the very progress being demanded for decades.
"Guterres has taken on inefficiencies with transparency and resolve — the kind of leadership the U.S. has said it wants in Turtle Bay. If Washington turns around and continues slashing funding as those reforms are taking hold, it will undermine the very progress it has demanded for decades."
An Historic Opportunity
UN80 is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to shape the United Nations into a 21st-century institution that delivers more and spends less. But the reforms will only reach their full potential if they’re matched with strategic investment — investment that keeps humanitarian pipelines open, maintains peacekeeping capacity in fragile regions and ensures the UN remains a platform for advancing U.S. priorities on everything from health security to counterterrorism.
The UN isn’t perfect. But it delivers aid in war zones where no other actor can. It coordinates disease responses that protect American lives. It stabilizes fragile states to prevent conflicts from spilling across borders. And it channels more than $2 billion a year in procurement contracts to U.S. companies, creating jobs at home – more money than we pay in membership dues. Less visible, but equally important, the UN trains and shapes the next generation of global leaders — including Americans who go on to serve in key diplomatic, development and security roles.
Washington’s Move
The choice for Congress and the Administration couldn’t be clearer: invest in a reformed UN that advances U.S. interests or leave a vacuum our competitors will eagerly fill.
The Secretary-General has put bold reforms on the table. Now it falls to Member States — above all, the United States — to seal the deal. Most countries want the same leaner, more effective UN that Washington has demanded for years. But making it real will require U.S. leadership to lock the changes in.
The UN is meeting the moment with real reform. It’s time for the United States to meet it with real support.
[post_title] => The UN is Delivering Reforms. Will the U.S. Deliver Support?
[post_excerpt] => The UN is delivering historic reform: a 15% budget cut and thousands of posts eliminated. The U.S. demanded efficiency. UN80 is delivering.
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => closed
[ping_status] => closed
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => the-us-is-getting-the-un-weve-been-asking-for-lets-back-the-reforms
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2025-09-25 20:34:17
[post_modified_gmt] => 2025-09-25 20:34:17
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://betterworldcampaign.org/?p=15296
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => post
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
)
This year's UN General Assembly put U.S. credibility under the spotlight, from Haiti’s security crisis and Syria’s return to Trump’s Ukraine pivot and sweeping UN reforms. Read our highlights from the debates that showed what America funds — and doesn't — shapes global security and U.S. influence.
U.S. rescissions and FY26 cuts threaten UN commitments in peacekeeping, health and child survival — putting American leadership and security at risk.
While President Trump’s General Assembly speech delivered a harsh critique of the UN, we look between the lines to see how the institution may be the partner America needs.
The UN is delivering historic reform: a 15% budget cut and thousands of posts eliminated. The U.S. demanded efficiency. UN80 is delivering.
Blog, Peace and Security
09/16/2025
Blog, Human Rights
09/04/2025
Sign up for our monthly newsletter
